“Solariums make a mockery of our efforts to reduce skin cancer”: Cancer Council Australia

Monday, May 16th, 2011

Cancer Council Australia has launched one of the strongest public attacks to date on the use and regulation of sunbeds in the country. This follows a report that some solarium devices emit UV radiation six times stronger than the sun at midday in Australia.

In a press release issued today, the CEO of Cancer Council Australia, Professor Ian Olver, cited a paper published in this month’s Photochemistry and Photobiology journal when calling for the Australian Government to phase out solariums. (more…)

Bookmark and Share

Dear 16-year-old Me

Thursday, May 5th, 2011

A great new viral video from the David Cornfield Melanoma Fund went live earlier this week. Check it out:

 

 

Head to the DCMF website for more on their work. You can read more about melanoma on our website.

Bookmark and Share

Tanning beds and the vitamin D debate

Thursday, April 21st, 2011

In a blog post last week we highlighted the mechanisms by which a tanning bed (solarium) can cause skin cancer, following new statistics on melanoma from the UK. Yet, individuals continue to use solariums – despite their risks – and much debate is ongoing about their exact impact upon human health, particularly with regards to vitamin D.

One of the key arguments made by advocates of solariums is that exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is essential for the production of vitamin D. Tanning beds are, in theory, a good source of this nutrient during the winter months or in locations which don’t receive much sunlight throughout the year. Yet, to consider this reasoning, it is first important to understand the science behind these concepts. (more…)

Bookmark and Share

How does indoor tanning cause skin cancer?

Wednesday, April 6th, 2011

Tanning causes skin cancerEarlier today, new stats were published by Cancer Research UK highlighting that two young adult Britons are diagnosed with skin cancer every day; a rate which has tripled since the 1970s. There were several factors highlighted as contributing to this increase, but one was most clearly singled out in the release:

“using a sunbed before the age of 35 can increase your risk of melanoma by 75%”

(more…)

Bookmark and Share

‘Measuring’ vitiligo: the challenges of clinical and treatment evaluation

Monday, April 4th, 2011

Since our announcement last year that Clinuvel would commence a new program for SCENESSE® (afamelanotide) in nonsegmental vitiligo, the company has received vast interest in the application of the drug in this disease. Of the enquiries that best captured the essence of this program, one stood out: a US based analyst asked how the company intended to objectively measure the response to treatment, the repigmentation of vitiliginous lesions, in its trial. (more…)

Bookmark and Share

Indigenous Australians not getting enough vitamin D

Friday, February 11th, 2011

A small, preliminary study from the University of Adelaide (UoA) has revealed that indigenous Australians could have a high rate of vitamin D deficiency.

Vitamin D, despite its name, is actually a group of pre-hormones which is needed in small quantities by the human body. It is produced naturally in the skin upon exposure to the ultraviolet B radiation (320-280nm) in sunlight and can also be acquired through diet or supplementation. Vitamin D plays a vital role in the development and maintenance of healthy bones and deficiency can lead to bone diseases such as rickets and osteomalacia. (more…)

Bookmark and Share

An update on phototherapy

Friday, December 10th, 2010

Those who follow the company’s clinical announcements would be well aware of our recently announced vitiligo program. To provide a deeper understanding of the science and the concept of phototherapy, today we’ve released a second technology update focused on exploring narrowband UVB technology. See our main site:

Technology Update II: Afamelanotide as an adjunct to phototherapy

Bookmark and Share

Sun-protective clothing: what does the UPF mean?

Thursday, November 11th, 2010

Most people are familiar with the term ‘SPF’ (sun protection factor), which describes the effectiveness of a sunscreen in protecting skin from UVB radiation (320-280 nm), but what about the less well-known ‘UPF’ ratings?

The UPF (ultraviolet protection factor) is a numerical rating given to clothing to indicate how effectively the fabric blocks ultraviolet (UV) radiation. A UPF rating of 25 means that only 1/25th (or 4%) of the UV radiation can penetrate the fabric. Unlike SPF, which only expresses a sunscreens protective value in terms of limited wavelengths of light, UPF applies to a range of broad spectrum UVA and UVB radiation. The highest UPF rating a garment can be assigned is 50+, a piece in this range is determined as providing “excellent” protection from UV radiation. (more…)

Bookmark and Share

A new program for SCENESSE®: nonsegmental vitiligo

Wednesday, August 25th, 2010

A patient with vitiliginous lesions on their fingers and hands

Today Clinuvel has announced that it will be commencing a new program for SCENESSE® in the common pigmentary disorder vitiligo. While this is an exciting development for Clinuvel – increasing the potential for SCENESSE® as a therapy – we feel it is vital to provide as much in-depth information on our program as is feasible to ensure our stakeholders are aware of what we anticipate will and will not be achieved with SCENESSE® as a repigmentation therapy. (more…)

Bookmark and Share

The evolution of human skin pigmentation: The delicate balance

Friday, July 16th, 2010

Skin colour is one of the most obvious and most variable traits humans possess. As visual creatures, people readily observe these differences in one another.  Anthropologist, Dr. Nina Jablonski, and colleague George Chaplin have unraveled the mystery behind the diversity of this distinguishing characteristic in their article, ‘Human skin pigmentation as an adaptation to UV radiation’. The pair have presented the first complete theory of skin colour as an evolutionary adaptation.

Paeleotologists have long known that human ancestors once had bodies covered with dense hair. Several theories on the evolution of the present ‘hairless condition’ exist. In this case, the authors suggest this was in response to hot conditions and the need to lose body heat upon physical activity. As naked beings, their once-protected skin became exposed to a multitude of environmental elements, including abrasion, infection, various chemicals and weather conditions. At the same time as the disappearance of the majority of body hair, humans evolved skin that was a more resilient barrier to such hazards and also contained the protective pigment eumelanin (melanin).

(more…)

Bookmark and Share