Overnight the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) has issued an update on its position statement on vitamin D, a hot topic in dermatology and medicine more broadly (and one we’ve discussed on the blog in some depth in the past).
In a release issued on their website, the AAD reaffirmed its stance that vitamin D – essential for human skeletal health – should be obtained through diet and/or dietary supplements, rather than risking exposure to ultraviolet light, a natural source of vitamin D for humans.
Relying on a literature review from the US National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine (IOM) which concluded that evidence of the role of vitamin D in various ailments beyond bone health was inconsistent, the AAD stated that “there is no scientifically proven, safe threshold of sun or indoor tanning device exposure that allows for maximum vitamin D synthesis in the skin without increasing the risk of skin cancer”.
AAD president, dermatologist William D. James, MD, was quoted in the release encouraging alternatives to UV exposure.
“The IOM’s review of the scientific evidence about vitamin D supports the Academy’s long-standing recommendation on safe ways to get this important vitamin – through a healthy diet which incorporates foods naturally rich in vitamin D, vitamin D-fortified foods and beverages, and vitamin D supplements,” Dr James said. “Individuals who intentionally expose themselves to UV radiation for vitamin D are putting their health at risk for developing skin cancer.”
Rather than risking sun exposure, the AAD urged individuals who were worried about their vitamin D intake to discuss their concerns with their physician.
Editor’s note
See the Clinuvel skin & health site for more on vitamin D
Image reference
“The Dynamic Sun [Solar Avalanche Coming]” uploaded to Flickr.com on August 5, 2009 by NASA Goddard Photo and Video <http://www.flickr.com/photos/gsfc/3797161425/>
